The interaction between population age structure and policy interventions on the spread of COVID-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
COVID-19 has triggered an unprecedented public health crisis and a global economic shock. As countries and cities have transitioned away from strict pandemic restrictions, the most effective reopening strategies may vary significantly based on their demographic characteristics and social contact patterns. In this study, we employed an extended age-specific compartment model that incorporates population mobility to investigate the interaction between population age structure and various containment interventions in New York, Los Angeles, Daegu, and Nairobi - four cities with distinct age distributions that served as local epicenters of the epidemic from January 2020 to March 2021. Our results demonstrated that individual social distancing or quarantine strategies alone cannot effectively curb the spread of infection over a one-year period. However, a combined strategy, including school closure, 50 % working from home, 50 % reduction in other mobility, 10 % quarantine rate, and city lockdown interventions, can effectively suppress the infection. Furthermore, our findings revealed that social-distancing policies exhibit strong age-specific effects, and age-targeted interventions can yield significant spillover benefits. Specifically, reducing contact rates among the population under 20 can prevent 14 %, 18 %, 56 %, and 99 % of infections across all age groups in New York, Los Angeles, Daegu, and Nairobi, respectively, surpassing the effectiveness of policies exclusively targeting adults over 60 years old. In particular, to protect the elderly, it is essential to reduce contacts between the younger population and people of all age groups, especially those over 60 years old. While an older population structure may escalate fatality risk, it might also decrease infection risk. Moreover, a higher basic reproduction number amplifies the impact of an older population structure on the fatality risk of the elderly. The considerable variations in susceptibility, severity, and mobility across age groups underscore the need for targeted interventions to effectively control the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate risks in future pandemics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".