MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408296160 · doi:10.3390/a18030154

An Adaptive Feature-Based Quantum Genetic Algorithm for Dimension Reduction with Applications in Outlier Detection

2025· article· en· W4408296160 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgorithms · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutlierDimension (graph theory)Reduction (mathematics)Computer scienceFeature (linguistics)Anomaly detectionDimensionality reductionAlgorithmQuantumGenetic algorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsMachine learningPhysicsCombinatoricsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dimensionality reduction is essential in machine learning, reducing dataset dimensions while enhancing classification performance. Feature Selection, a key subset of dimensionality reduction, identifies the most relevant features. Genetic Algorithms (GA) are widely used for feature selection due to their robust exploration and efficient convergence. However, GAs often suffer from premature convergence, getting stuck in local optima. Quantum Genetic Algorithm (QGA) address this limitation by introducing quantum representations to enhance the search process. To further improve QGA performance, we propose an Adaptive Feature-Based Quantum Genetic Algorithm (FbQGA), which strengthens exploration and exploitation through quantum representation and adaptive quantum rotation. The rotation angle dynamically adjusts based on feature significance, optimizing feature selection. FbQGA is applied to outlier detection tasks and benchmarked against basic GA and QGA variants on five high-dimensional, imbalanced datasets. Performance is evaluated using metrics like classification accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, selected feature count, and computational cost. Results consistently show FbQGA outperforming other methods, with significant improvements in feature selection efficiency and computational cost. These findings highlight FbQGA’s potential as an advanced tool for feature selection in complex datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it