An Adaptive Feature-Based Quantum Genetic Algorithm for Dimension Reduction with Applications in Outlier Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dimensionality reduction is essential in machine learning, reducing dataset dimensions while enhancing classification performance. Feature Selection, a key subset of dimensionality reduction, identifies the most relevant features. Genetic Algorithms (GA) are widely used for feature selection due to their robust exploration and efficient convergence. However, GAs often suffer from premature convergence, getting stuck in local optima. Quantum Genetic Algorithm (QGA) address this limitation by introducing quantum representations to enhance the search process. To further improve QGA performance, we propose an Adaptive Feature-Based Quantum Genetic Algorithm (FbQGA), which strengthens exploration and exploitation through quantum representation and adaptive quantum rotation. The rotation angle dynamically adjusts based on feature significance, optimizing feature selection. FbQGA is applied to outlier detection tasks and benchmarked against basic GA and QGA variants on five high-dimensional, imbalanced datasets. Performance is evaluated using metrics like classification accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, selected feature count, and computational cost. Results consistently show FbQGA outperforming other methods, with significant improvements in feature selection efficiency and computational cost. These findings highlight FbQGA’s potential as an advanced tool for feature selection in complex datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".