MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Coverage Path Planning in Unknown Environments

2024· article· en· W4408401213 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceMotion planningPath (computing)Artificial intelligenceReinforcementEngineeringComputer networkRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) algorithm offers a robust solution for the coverage path planning problem, where a robot must effectively and efficiently cover a designated area, ensuring minimal redundancy and maximum coverage. Traditional methods for path planning often lack the adaptability required for dynamic and unstructured environments. In contrast, TD3 utilizes twin Q-networks to reduce overestimation bias, delayed policy updates for increased stability, and target policy smoothing to maintain smooth transitions in the robot's path. These features allow the robot to learn an optimal path strategy in real-time, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation. This paper explores the application of TD3 to coverage path planning, demonstrating that it enables a robot to adaptively and efficiently navigate complex coverage tasks, showing significant advantages over conventional methods in terms of coverage rate, total length, and adaptability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207