MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408436864 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-7022

ClimateEU: A high-resolution database of historical and future climate for Europe developed with deep neural networks

2025· preprint· en· W4408436864 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Hamann, Sarah Namiiro, Tongli Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkHigh resolutionComputer scienceResolution (logic)Artificial intelligenceData scienceDatabaseGeographyRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study contributes an accessible, comprehensive database of interpolated climate data for Europe that includes monthly, annual, decadal, and 30-year normal climate data for the last approximately 120 years (1901 to present) as well as multi-model CMIP6 climate change projections for the 21st century. The database includes variables relevant for ecological research and infrastructure planning, and comprises more than 25,000 climate grids that can be queried with a provided ClimateEU software package to extract time series for lists of sample locations, or custom grids for specific study areas at any resolution and projection. In addition, continent-wide 1km resolution gridded data are available for download (http://tinyurl.com/ClimateEU). The climate grids were developed with a three-step approach, using thin-plate spline interpolations of weather station data as a first approximation (replacing otherwise needed lengthy pre-training of the neural network). Subsequently, a novel deep learning approach is used to model orographic precipitation, rain shadows, lake and coastal effects at moderate resolution (2.5 arcmin). Lastly, lapse-rate based downscaling is applied to generate high-resolution grids (up to a useful resolution of 250 m in mountenous terrain). The climate estimates were optimized and cross-validated with a checkerboard approach to ensure that training data was spatially distanced from validation data. We conclude with a discussion of applications and limitations of this database.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207