Runoff Forecasting in Unmeasured Catchments and Rapid Flash Flood Prediction Based on Deep Learning.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Runoff forecasting is a long-standing challenge in hydrology, particularly in unmeasured catchments and rapid flash flood prediction. For unmeasured catchment forecasting, we introduce the encoder-decoder-based dual-layer long short-term memory (ED-DLSTM) model[1]. This model fuses static spatial granularity attributes with temporal dynamic variables to achieve streamflow forecasting at a global scale. ED-DLSTM reaches an average Nash efficiency coefficient (NSE) of 0.75 across more than 2000 catchments from historical datasets in the United States, Canada, Central Europe, and the United Kingdom. Additionally, ED-DLSTM is applied to 150 fully ungauged catchments in Chile, achieving a high NSE of 0.65. The interpretability of the transfer capacities of ED-DLSTM is effectively tracked through the cell state induced by adding a spatial attribute encoding module, which can spontaneously form hydrological regionalization effects after performing spatial coding for different catchments.Moreover, rapid flood prediction with daily resolution is challenged to capture changes in runoff over short periods. To address this, we also propose a benchmark evaluation for runoff and flood forecasting based on deep learning (RF-Bench) at an hourly scale. We introduce the Mamba model to hydrology for the first time. The benchmark also includes Dlinear, LSTM, Transformer, and its improved versions (Informer, Autoformer, Patch Transformer). Results indicate that the Patch Transformer exhibits optimal predictive capability across multiple lead times, while the traditional LSTM model demonstrates stable performance, and the Mamba model strikes a good balance between performance and stability. We reveal the attention patterns of Transformer models in hydrological modeling, finding that attention is time-sensitive and that the attention scores for dynamic variables are higher than those for static attributes.Our work [2,3] provides the hydrological community with an open-source, scalable platform, contributing to the advancement of deep learning in the field of hydrology. [1] Zhang, B., Ouyang, C., Cui, P., Xu, Q., Wang, D., Zhang, F., Li, Z., Fan, L., Lovati, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., 2024. Deep learning for cross-region streamflow and flood forecasting at a global scale. The Innovation 5, 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100617[2] Zhang, B., Ouyang, C., Wang, D., Wang, F., Xu, Q., 2023. A PANN-Based Grid Downscaling Technology and Its Application in Landslide and Flood Modeling. Remote Sensing 15, 5075. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15205075[3] Xu, Q., Shi, Y., Bamber, J.L., Ouyang, C., Zhu, X.X., 2024. Large-scale flood modeling and forecasting with FloodCast. Water Research 264, 122162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122162
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".