MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408507788 · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108421

A partial correlation-based connectedness approach: Extreme dependence among commodities and portfolio implications

2025· article· en· W4408507788 on OpenAlexaff
Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad, Elie Bouri, Sitara Karim, Perry Sadorsky

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Economics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial connectednessEconomicsPortfolioEconometricsCorrelationPartial correlationFinancial economicsMathematicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a partial correlation-based connectedness approach to study the directional connectedness under normal and extreme market conditions among the returns of 22 commodities and compare it with the well-known Diebold and Yilmaz (i.e. generalized forecast error variance decomposition (GFEVD)) connectedness approach estimated at the mean and tails. Considering four groups of commodities, namely energy, agricultural, precious metals, and industrial metals, and daily data from September 1, 2005 to June 5, 2024, covering various crisis periods, we draw filtered networks and measures of directional connectedness. The main results are summarized as follows. Firstly, the total connectedness index captures the significant commodities related shocks, and intensifies during crises episodes, notably at the extreme lower quantile. Secondly, using partial correlations in the approach of connectedness leads to a surge of the total connectedness level at the extreme lower quantile and identifies the beginnings of major crises earlier than the GFEVD measure of connectedness. Thirdly, the connectedness structure of commodities based on partial correlation is unstable during turbulent market conditions, a feature that is ignored when the GFEVD approach of connectedness is used. Fourthly, in terms of practical implications, the partial correlation-based connectedness portfolio outperforms the GFEVD based minimum connectedness portfolio on a risk adjusted basis. • We proposed a PCBC approach to study connectedness in 22 commodity returns under normal & extreme market conditions. • PCBC TCI detects major commodity shocks & surges during crises, signaling heightened market stress effectively. • PCBC TCI identifies crisis onset earlier than GFEVD, offering a more responsive measure of market turmoil. • PCBC portfolio outperforms GFEVD-based minimum connectedness portfolio on risk-adjusted basis, improving efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy EconomicsSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207