MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408540474 · doi:10.23977/acss.2025.090111

Gene Regulatory Network Inference Based on Convolutional GRU

2025· article· en· W4408540474 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInferenceGene regulatory networkComputer scienceComputational biologyArtificial intelligenceGeneBiologyGeneticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-course single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data reflect gene expression changes over time, offering a valuable resource for exploring dynamic gene interactions and building dynamic gene regulatory networks (GRNs). However, most existing methods are typically designed for bulk RNA sequencing (bulk RNA-seq) data and cannot be directly applied to time-course scRNA-seq data. Addressing this issue, we present CGGRN, an approach based on convolutional gated recurrent unit (GRU) for inferring GRNs. CGGRN transforms time-course data into images, including raw pairwise gene images and neighborhood images, and aggregates them with time point information into a four-dimensional tensor. The tensor is then fed into the convolutional GRU to capture features for each gene pair and reconstruct the GRN. We conducted trials on four time-course scRNA-seq datasets using CGGRN, and the outcomes show that CGGRN surpasses existing models in constructing GRN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it