Demographic study of staphylococcal pododermatitis in Jabalpur
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of Staphylococcal pododermatitis amongst different dermatological conditions. During the study period, a total of 2475 dogs presented to VCC, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Jabalpur (M.P.) were screened over six months period from May to October 2024. Out of which, 248 dogs showed clinical signs pertaining to pododermatitis, the overall occurrence of pododermatitis was 3.27% although the occurrence of Staphylococcal pododermatitis was 1.29%. Higher occurrence was observed in male dogs (43.18%) in comparison to females. Dogs in the age group of 1-3 years were mostly susceptible (50%) to Staphylococcal pododermatitis and the least susceptible were below 1 year of age. Results revealed that Labrador (44.44%) were more predisposed followed by non-descript (41.67%) and the least predisposed breed was found to be Pug (30.77%). The most common clinical signs of pododermatitis observed were licking (53.13%), erythema (43.75%) with limping and bleeding the least presented clinic signs (6.25% each). The clinical signs were more prominent in all four paws.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it