MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408590461 · doi:10.1109/tmlcn.2025.3551689

Closed-Loop Clustering-Based Global Bandwidth Prediction in Real-Time Video Streaming

2025· article· en· W4408590461 on OpenAlexaff
Sepideh Afshar, Reza Razavi, Mohammad Moshirpour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisBandwidth (computing)Real-time computingVideo streamingStreaming dataData miningArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate throughput forecasting is essential for ensuring the seamless operation of Real-Time Communication (RTC) applications. These demands for accurate throughput forecasting become particularly challenging when dealing with wireless access links, as they inherently exhibit fluctuating bandwidth. Ensuring an exceptional user Quality of Experience (QoE) in this scenario depends on accurately predicting available bandwidth in the short term since it plays a pivotal role in guiding video rate adaptation. Yet, current methodologies for short-term bandwidth prediction (SBP) struggle to perform adequately in dynamically changing real-world network environments and lack generalizability to adapt across varied network conditions. Also, acquiring long and representative traces that capture real-world network complexity is challenging. To overcome these challenges, we propose closed-loop clustering-based Global Forecasting Models (GFMs) for SBP. Unlike local models, GFMs apply the same function to all traces enabling cross-learning, and leveraging relationships among traces to address the performance issues seen in current SBP algorithms. To address potential heterogeneity within the data and improve prediction quality, a clustered-wise GFM is utilized to group similar traces based on prediction accuracy. Finally, the proposed method is validated using real-world datasets of HSDPA 3G, NYC LTE, and Irish 5G data demonstrating significant improvements in accuracy and generalizability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and NetworkingSame topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207