MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In My Brothers’ Shadows: A Review of the Film Chappaquiddick

2018· review· en· W4408629486 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ingrid Grieger, Joseph G. Ponterotto

Bibliographic record

VenueClio s Psyche · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicJungian Analytical Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Almost 55 years after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, the public’s fascination with the Kennedy family and the legacy of Camelot continues. In September 2017 the film Chappaquiddick premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival, and this past April 2018 the film opened to a broad national release. Readers of this journal will remember the tragedy on Chappaquiddick Island, where on July 18, 1969, during a reunion with former staffers of Robert F. Kennedy’s 1968 campaign, Senator Edward M. (Ted) Kennedy left the party with Mary Jo Kopechne. Driving down a dark road, ostensibly to take Mary Jo to the ferry back to her motel in Edgartown, Ted loses control of the Oldsmobile he is driving, and the car overturns in Poucha Pond. Ted escapes the submerged vehicle, but Mary Jo does not. The film poignantly captures Mary Jo’s last horrific moments of life as she desperately lifts her mouth and nose into the last remaining air pockets in the car as the water rushes in.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClio s PsycheSame topicJungian Analytical PsychologyFrench-language works237,207