MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In My Brothers’ Shadows: A Review of the Film Chappaquiddick

2018· review· en· W4408629486 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClio s Psyche · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicJungian Analytical Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Almost 55 years after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, the public’s fascination with the Kennedy family and the legacy of Camelot continues. In September 2017 the film Chappaquiddick premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival, and this past April 2018 the film opened to a broad national release. Readers of this journal will remember the tragedy on Chappaquiddick Island, where on July 18, 1969, during a reunion with former staffers of Robert F. Kennedy’s 1968 campaign, Senator Edward M. (Ted) Kennedy left the party with Mary Jo Kopechne. Driving down a dark road, ostensibly to take Mary Jo to the ferry back to her motel in Edgartown, Ted loses control of the Oldsmobile he is driving, and the car overturns in Poucha Pond. Ted escapes the submerged vehicle, but Mary Jo does not. The film poignantly captures Mary Jo’s last horrific moments of life as she desperately lifts her mouth and nose into the last remaining air pockets in the car as the water rushes in.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it