MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408662788 · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100490

Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter During Pregnancy Is Associated With Hippocampal Development in Offspring

2025· article· en· W4408662788 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Psychiatry Global Open Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersNational Medical Research CouncilNational Institute of Mental HealthMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthSingapore Institute for Clinical SciencesMinistry of Health -SingaporeStanford Maternal and Child Health Research InstituteAgency for Science, Technology and ResearchBrain and Behavior Research Foundation
KeywordsOffspringParticulatesHippocampal formationPregnancyBrain developmentPhysiologyMedicineEnvironmental chemistryEndocrinologyBiologyChemistryNeuroscienceGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the global climate crisis persists, it becomes increasingly important to understand how exposure to environmental toxins can affect the developing brain. Although researchers are beginning to document links between prenatal exposure to air pollution and brain structure, it is not clear when these associations emerge. We leveraged data from the GUSTO (Growing Up Toward Healthy Outcomes in Singapore) longitudinal birth cohort study to examine prenatal exposure to air pollution and brain development during childhood. Spatiotemporally interpolated prenatal exposure to particulate matter <2.5 μm was averaged across each prenatal week. Structural magnetic resonance imaging data were obtained when children were ages 4.5, 6.0, 7.5, and 10.5 years ( N = 325, 47.7% female) and segmented with FreeSurfer 7.1. A subset of parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist at the final assessment ( n = 195, 46.7% female). We used latent growth modeling to estimate a slope of hippocampal volume growth in each hemisphere from ages 4.5 to 10.5 years, adjusted for intracranial volume. Distributed lag models indicated that late gestational exposure (during weeks 36–40) was associated with slower hippocampal growth in both hemispheres. Importantly, we also found that faster hippocampal volume growth in the right hemisphere was associated with more externalizing and attention problems at 10.5 years. Future research should examine mechanisms that may underlie or contribute to these associations. These findings underscore the importance of efforts to reduce pollution, particularly for pregnant people and their children. We examined associations between prenatal air pollution exposure and hippocampal volume development in children from ages 4 to 10 years. We found that hippocampal volume increased over time in both the left and right hemispheres of the brain, but these increases were smaller among children who were exposed to higher levels of air pollution during the last 4 weeks of pregnancy. Furthermore, faster hippocampal growth was associated with more externalizing and attention problems when children were age 10 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it