MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408798047 · doi:10.1080/1755182x.2025.2471474

The Bokor Palace Hotel: a colonial white elephant atop Cambodia’s Elephant Mountains

2025· article· en· W4408798047 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Tourism History · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCambodian History and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsColonialismWhite (mutation)Ancient historyGeographyArchaeologyEthnologyArtHistoryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During World War I, French colonial planners designed a lavish project for a hill station that would cater to Cambodia’s miniscule settler population. At the heart of these schemes was an ultra-luxurious hotel, known as the Bokor Palace. This article analyses the genesis, pitfalls and vagaries of what rapidly became a colonial white elephant. It focuses on the logic undergirding the hill station, on the everyday workings of the hotel, on its role as a colonial enclave, promontory and site of privilege, and its struggle to find a clientele, local or international. The piece sheds light on several of the specificities and ambitions of French colonial tourism, contrasting representations with touristic practices on the ground. It closes with a foray into the postcolonial era, when the Bokor Palace experienced another cycle of booms and busts, before reopening in 2018.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it