MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408822061 · doi:10.3390/fractalfract9040200

Applications of Inverse Operators to a Fractional Partial Integro-Differential Equation and Several Well-Known Differential Equations

2025· article· en· W4408822061 on OpenAlexafffund
Chenkuan Li, Wenyuan Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueFractal and Fractional · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryBrandon University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsDifferential equationFirst-order partial differential equationInverseMathematical analysisIntegro-differential equationApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper mainly consists of two parts: (i) We study the uniqueness, existence, and stability of a new fractional nonlinear partial integro-differential equation in Rn with three-point conditions and variable coefficients in a Banach space using inverse operators containing multi-variable functions, a generalized Mittag-Leffler function, as well as a few popular fixed-point theorems. These studies have good applications in general since uniqueness, existence and stability are key and important topics in many fields. Several examples are presented to demonstrate applications of results obtained by computing approximate values of the generalized Mittag-Leffler functions. (ii) We use the inverse operator method and newly established spaces to find analytic solutions to a number of notable partial differential equations, such as a multi-term time-fractional convection problem and a generalized time-fractional diffusion-wave equation in Rn with initial conditions only, which have never been previously considered according to the best of our knowledge. In particular, we deduce the uniform solution to the non-homogeneous wave equation in n dimensions for all n≥1, which coincides with classical results such as d’Alembert and Kirchoff’s formulas but is much easier in the computation of finding solutions without any complicated integrals on balls or spheres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFractal and FractionalSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207