Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Particle physics describes the interplay of matter and forces through gauge theories. Yet, the intrinsic quantum nature of gauge theories makes important problems notoriously difficult for classical computational techniques. Quantum computers offer a promising way to overcome these roadblocks. We demonstrate two essential requirements on this path: first, we perform a quantum computation of the properties of the basic building block of two-dimensional lattice quantum electrodynamics, involving both gauge fields and matter. Second, we show how to refine the gauge-field discretization beyond its minimal representation, using a trapped-ion qudit quantum processor, where quantum information is encoded in several states per ion. Such qudits are ideally suited for describing gauge fields, which are naturally high dimensional, leading to reduced register size and circuit complexity. We prepare the ground state of the model using a variational quantum eigensolver and observe the effect of dynamical matter on quantized magnetic fields. By controlling the qudit dimension, we also show how to seamlessly observe the effect of different gauge-field truncations. Finally, we experimentally study the dynamics of pair creation and magnetic energy. Our results open the door for hardware-efficient quantum simulations of gauge theories with qudits in near-term quantum devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it