Dynamic Scheduling Strategies for Resource Optimization in Computing Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid development of cloud-native architecture has promoted the widespread application of container technology, but the optimization problems in container scheduling and resource management still face many challenges. This paper proposes a container scheduling method based on multi-objective optimization, which aims to balance key performance indicators such as resource utilization, load balancing and task completion efficiency. By introducing optimization models and heuristic algorithms, the scheduling strategy is comprehensively improved, and experimental verification is carried out using the real Google Cluster Data dataset. The experimental results show that compared with traditional static rule algorithms and heuristic algorithms, the optimized scheduling scheme shows significant advantages in resource utilization, load balancing and burst task completion efficiency. This shows that the proposed method can effectively improve resource management efficiency and ensure service quality and system stability in complex dynamic cloud environments. At the same time, this paper also explores the future development direction of scheduling algorithms in multi-tenant environments, heterogeneous cloud computing, and cross-edge and cloud collaborative computing scenarios, and proposes research prospects for energy consumption optimization, adaptive scheduling and fairness. The research results not only provide a theoretical basis and practical reference for container scheduling under cloud-native architecture, but also lay a foundation for further realizing intelligent and efficient resource management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".