SDGs, Environmental Policy Integration, and Tourism in Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental policy integration (EPI) is put forth as a potential tool for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and transitioning to a more sustainable global community. Tourism is one sector that consists of multiple industries and has a high potential to achieve these goals. Examining local, provincial, and federal tourism policies, as well as undertaking in-depth interviews, this research sought to determine to what extent the SDGs are integrated into different levels of Canadian tourism policy and strategy using the framework of EPI to determine inclusion, consistency, weighting, resources, and reporting. Findings show that although there is a greater inclusion and consistency of elements relating to the SDGs at all levels of government, there is a general lack of specific mentions of the goals and even less weighting, consistency, and reporting. Implications of this research outline that a more concerted horizontal and vertical approach is needed across policy sectors as well as all levels of government.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it