Text Classification Method Based on Gating Mechanism and Graph Convolutional Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graph convolutional networks (GCN), in contrast to traditional neural networks, demonstrate advantages in handling non-Euclidean text classification problems by accommodating nodes and graphs with arbitrary topological structures. However, existing text classification models based on GCN often aggregate neighboring node information with equal or preset edge weights, neglecting effective consideration of local interactions between words. This limitation leads to insufficient expression of semantic information for nodes. Therefore, this paper proposes a text classification method based on the gating mechanism and graph convolutional networks. In this approach, termed graph convolutional networks based on the gating mechanism (GM-GCN), the gating mechanism is integrated with the two layers of GCN in TextGCN. GM-GCN utilizes a select matrix with gating functionality to control information transmission, allowing for the selective fusion of neighborhood information at multiple orders for nodes in the graph. This approach preserves prior orders' information, enabling a more effective focus on local interactions between words. Consequently, it enriches nodes' feature representation in capturing textual semantics. The experimental results demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy, precision, recall, GPU memory consumption, and runtime when compared with other classical and latest text classification models across four benchmark datasets: 20NG, R8, R52, and Ohsumed. For accuracy, this proposed method achieved notable enhancements of 0.34%, 0.27%, 0.32%, and 0.25%, respectively. Regarding precision, improvements were observed at 0.33%, 0.25%, 0.29%, and 0.24%, while recall showed enhancements of 0.28%, 0.31%, 0.26%, and 0.22%, respectively. In GPU memory consumption, the method demonstrated reductions of 137MB, 73MB, 86MB, and 88MB in space, and in terms of runtime, it exhibited decreases of 26s, 9s, 13s, and 16s, respectively. As a result of these findings, the proposed approach was found to be effective in improving text classification performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".