MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409001157 · doi:10.1016/j.ejop.2025.126147

Testate amoebae are informative bioindicators of critically high ammonia deposition on peatlands

2025· article· en· W4409001157 on OpenAlexaff
Callum R C Evans, D. Hatton, Graeme T. Swindles

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Protistology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioindicatorBiologyTestate amoebaePeatAmmoniaEcologyDeposition (geology)Environmental chemistryBiochemistrySedimentPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global nitrogen cycle has been majorly disrupted by anthropogenic activity. While nitrogen emissions in the UK and Ireland are declining, ammonia (NH 3 ) remains a significant exception. NH 3 emissions are mostly agriculturally sourced and deposited on nearby habitats at high rates in both countries. Peatlands are globally important wetlands that are vulnerable to NH 3 deposition. Essential peatland restoration risks being diminished by excessive NH 3 deposition, leading to the loss of valuable ecosystem services. This study investigates testate amoebae (indicators of contemporary and historic peatland conditions) as bioindicators of seasonal NH 3 deposition on six peatlands across Northern Ireland, UK. Sphagnum , an NH 3 -sensitive bryophyte, was sampled adjacent to NH 3 monitoring sites once per season for a year. When NH 3 deposition was critically high, multivariate analysis demonstrates a link between NH 3 and testate amoebae assemblage change. Similarly, at high NH 3 deposition sites, testate amoebae taxa diversity is observed to be significantly reduced in springtime, when it is expected to be highest. Although, in response to high NH 3 deposition large algivorous taxa do not proliferate as was anticipated, and mixotrophic taxa abundance decreases could not be linked primarily to NH 3 . This research demonstrates the continued potential of testate amoebae as highly informative peatland bioindicators. • The first field study focussing on testate amoebae as bioindicators of seasonal NH 3 deposition on peatland ecosystems. • Multivariate analysis of testate amoebae assemblages showed critically high ammonia deposition in four lowland raised bogs. • Testate amoebae diversity was found to be unseasonably low during spring in critically high ammonia deposition sites. • A decline in mixotrophic testate amoebae was observed during the summer sampling period. • A hypothesised increase in large algivorous taxa in response to rising NH 3 deposition was not evident in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of ProtistologySame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207