MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409002588 · doi:10.20883/medical.e1245

Neurological and renal complications in obese children with cancer: a systematic review of cardiovascular risk factors

2025· review· en· W4409002588 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Science · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCancerObesityIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obesity in children, especially those with cancer, is a growing concern due to its impact on health outcomes. These children are at increased risk for neurological, renal, and cardiovascular complications, which can worsen their prognosis. This systematic review aims to examine the role of obesity in the development of these complications in children with cancer, highlighting the associated cardiovascular risk factors. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2014 and 2025. Eligible studies included interventional, cohort, case-control, and observational studies that examined the impact of cancer treatments on neurological and renal outcomes in obese pediatric patients. The review followed PRISMA guidelines to ensure methodological rigor, with quality assessment using validated tools such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and STROBE checklist. Thirteen studies involving 14,723 participants met the inclusion criteria. Obesity was associated with poorer survival outcomes, particularly in children with ALL and CNS tumors, showing lower EFS and OS rates. Obese children undergoing chemotherapy had higher incidences of treatment-related toxicities, including hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and thrombotic events. Renal complications, including acute kidney injury and electrolyte imbalances, were more prevalent in obese patients. Obesity also increased cardiovascular risk, with higher rates of hypertension and insulin resistance. Additionally, it contributed to neurocognitive impairments and poor psychosocial outcomes. Lastly, obesity affected growth trajectories, with many survivors remaining obese long-term. Early weight management and personalized treatment strategies are crucial to mitigate these risks. Addressing obesity in pediatric cancer care is essential to improve treatment outcomes and long-term survivorship, with further research needed to develop effective interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it