MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409014287 · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103122

HawkEars: A regional, high-performance avian acoustic classifier

2025· article· en· W4409014287 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jan Huus, Kevin G. Kelly, Erin M. Bayne, Elly C. Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Canadian institutionsAlberta Biodiversity Monitoring InstituteUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClassifier (UML)Computer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passive acoustic monitoring is rapidly emerging as a dominant approach for studying acoustic wildlife, with neural networks used as an increasingly common and promising approach for extracting detections of particular species from acoustic recordings. Existing options for avian classifiers include small custom models for focal species or large models that attempt to classify the entire global avian community, which suggests a possible tradeoff between classifier performance and species coverage. We argue that building domain-specific classifiers for particular geographic regions provides improved performance in exchange for reduced species coverage and present HawkEars, a regional avian classifier for Canada that includes 314 bird and 13 amphibian species. A major challenge in classifier development is the weak labeling of open access datasets. We developed a novel solution, using embedding-based search to efficiently generate strong labels. We evaluated HawkEars performance for bird species relative to two prominent avian community classifiers: BirdNET, and Perch for two datasets representing two applications: bird community surveys and studies of vocal activity rate. We found HawkEars had substantially higher performance across all metrics, detected on average two more species per recording minute in our community evaluation dataset, and had a recall of nearly twice Perch and four times BirdNET, given a precision of 0.9, for our vocal activity evaluation dataset. We suggest HawkEars provides better classification performance because a smaller species pool allows for more resources allocated per species to training and tuning and reduces the risk of class overlap, and our strong labeling method ensures high-quality training data. While our classifier, HawkEars, is a substantial improvement for practitioners studying acoustic wildlife in Canada and the northern United States, practitioners in other regions can use the HawkEars open-source code to build classifiers for other geographic regions. By continuing to improve deep-learning classification performance, HawkEars has the potential to substantially improve the efficiency and utility of passive acoustic monitoring studies. • HawkEars: A high-performance bird sound classifier for Canada • We used a novel embeddings search to create strongly-labeled training datasets • We incorporated several custom heuristics and a submodel to improve performance • HawkEars outperforms existing classifiers across all metrics at the community level and for more than 80 % of single species

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcological InformaticsSame topicAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207