Columba: Fast Approximate Pattern Matching with Optimized Search Schemes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aligning sequencing reads to reference genomes is a fundamental task in bioinformatics. Aligners can be classified as lossy or lossless: lossy aligners prioritize speed by reporting only one or a few high-scoring alignments, whereas lossless aligners output all optimal alignments, ensuring completeness and sensitivity. This paper introduces Columba, a high-performance lossless aligner tailored for Illumina sequencing data. Columba processes single or paired-end reads in FASTQ format and outputs alignments in SAM format. By utilizing advanced search schemes and bit-parallel alignment techniques, Columba achieves exceptional speed. Columba is available in two variants. The first is based on the bidirectional FM-index. The second, Columba RLC, employs run-length compression using a bidirectional move structure, significantly reducing memory usage for large, repetitive datasets like pan-genomes. Through extensive benchmarking, Columba outperforms existing lossless aligners in speed, particularly at higher error rates. Tests on the human genome and bacterial and human pan-genome datasets demonstrate Columba’s robustness and efficiency. We integrated Columba into the OptiType HLA genotyping pipeline, where it substantially reduced computational time while maintaining accuracy. These results position Columba as a versatile, state-of-the-art tool for high-sensitivity genomic analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".