OneOS: Distributed Operating System for the Edge-to-Cloud Continuum
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Application developers often need to employ a combination of software such as communication middleware and cloud-based services to deal with the challenges of heterogeneity and network dynamism in the edge-to-cloud continuum. Consequently, developers write extra glue code peripheral to the application's core business logic, to provide interoperability between interacting software frameworks. Each software framework comes with its own framework-specific API, and as technology evolves, the developer must keep up with the changing APIs by updating the glue code in their application. Thus, framework-specific APIs hinder interoperability and cause technology fragmentation. We propose a design of a middleware-based distributed operating system (OS) called OneOS to realize a computing paradigm that alleviates such interoperability challenges. OneOS provides a single system image of the distributed computing platform, and transparently provides interoperability between software components through the standard POSIX API. Using OneOS's domain-specific language, users can compose complex distributed applications from legacy POSIX programs. OneOS tolerates failures by adopting a distributed checkpoint-restore algorithm. We evaluate the performance of OneOS against an open-source IoT Platform, ThingsJS, using an IoT stream processing benchmark suite, and a video processing application. OneOS executes the programs about 3x faster than ThingsJS, reduces the code size by about 22%, and recovers the state of failed applications within 1 second upon detecting their failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it