PIMnet: A Domain-Specific Network for Efficient Collective Communication in Scalable PIM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Processing-in-memory (PIM), where compute is moved closer to memory or data, has been explored to accelerate emerging workloads. Different PIM-based systems have been announced, each offering a unique microarchitectural organization of their compute units, ranging from fixed functional units to programmable general-purpose compute cores near memory. However, one fundamental limitation of PIM is that each compute unit can only access its local memory; access to “remote” memory must occur through the host CPU - potentially limiting application performance scalability. In this work, we first characterize the scalability of real PIM architectures using the UPMEM PIM system. We analyze how the overhead of communicating through the host (instead of providing direct communication between the PIM compute units) can become a bottleneck for collective communications that are commonly used in many workloads. To overcome this inter-PIM bank communication, we propose PIMnet - a PIM interconnection network for PIM banks that provides direct connectivity between compute units and removes the overhead of communicating through the host. PIMnet exploits bandwidth parallelism where communication across the different PIM bank/chips can occur in parallel to maximize communication performance. PIMnet also matches the DRAM packaging hierarchy with a multi-tier network architecture. Unlike traditional interconnection networks, PIMnet is a PIMcontrolled network where communication is managed by the PIM logic, optimizing collective communications and minimizing the hardware overhead of PIMnet. Our evaluation of PIMnet shows that it provides up to $85 \times$ speedup on collective communications and achieves a $11.8 \times$ improvement on real applications compared to the baseline PIM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".