MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409309391 · doi:10.30574/wjarr.2020.8.2.0409

Digital Twin and BIM synergy for predictive maintenance in smart building engineering systems development

2020· article· en· W4409309391 on OpenAlexaff
Iyiola Oladehinde Olaseni

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTechnology Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredictive maintenanceSystems engineeringComputer scienceConstruction engineeringEngineeringArchitectural engineeringReliability engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid evolution of smart building engineering has redefined how modern infrastructure is designed, operated, and maintained. At the intersection of this transformation lies the convergence of Digital Twin technology and Building Information Modelling (BIM), offering a dynamic and data-driven approach to predictive maintenance. Digital Twins, which serve as real-time virtual replicas of physical assets, when integrated with the information-rich environment of BIM, enable enhanced visibility, control, and foresight into building system performance. This synergy bridges the gap between design and operation, fostering a proactive maintenance culture within increasingly complex built environments. This paper investigates how the integration of BIM and Digital Twin frameworks supports predictive maintenance strategies in smart building systems. It explores the foundational principles of each technology and examines their interoperability in creating self-aware, responsive infrastructures. Emphasis is placed on real-time sensor integration, historical data mapping, anomaly detection, and the simulation of future scenarios to anticipate system failures before they occur. Through the implementation of Digital Twin-BIM ecosystems, facility managers and engineers gain continuous insights into HVAC, lighting, structural, and safety systems, thereby reducing downtime, optimizing performance, and extending asset life cycles. The study also outlines the challenges in deploying this hybrid model, including data standardization, interoperability gaps, and the need for cross-domain collaboration. Case references illustrate how early adopters have leveraged this synergy for smart facilities management and sustainable building lifecycle planning. Ultimately, the convergence of Digital Twins and BIM represents a paradigm shift toward intelligent, self-maintaining infrastructure, signaling a new era of digitally augmented engineering practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Advanced Research and ReviewsSame topicTechnology Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207