MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409323950 · doi:10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf034

Development and multinational validation of an ensemble deep learning algorithm for detecting and predicting structural heart disease using noisy single-lead electrocardiograms

2025· article· en· W4409323950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Digital Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthYale UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaNational Institute on AgingBristol-Myers SquibbDoris Duke Charitable Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceMultinational corporationArtificial intelligenceEnsemble learningLead (geology)AlgorithmCross-validationMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Finance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) can detect a range of structural heart diseases (SHDs); however, it has a limited role in community-based screening. We developed and externally validated a noise-resilient single-lead AI-ECG algorithm that can detect SHDs and predict the risk of their development using wearable/portable devices. Methods and results Using 266 740 ECGs from 99 205 patients with paired echocardiographic data at Yale New Haven Hospital, we developed AI Deep learning for Adapting Portable Technology in HEART disease detection (ADAPT-HEART), a noise-resilient, deep learning algorithm, to detect SHDs using lead I ECG. SHD was defined as a composite of having a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 40%, moderate or severe left-sided valvular disease, and severe left ventricular hypertrophy. ADAPT-HEART was validated in four community hospitals in USA, and the population-based cohort of ELSA-Brasil. We assessed the model’s performance as a predictive biomarker among those without baseline SHD across hospital-based sites and the UK Biobank. The development population had a median age of 66 [interquartile range, 54–77] years and included 49 947 (50.3%) women, with 18 896 (19.0%) having any SHD. ADAPT-HEART had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.879 (95% confidence interval, 0.870–0.888) with good calibration for detecting SHD in the test set, and consistent performance in hospital-based external sites (AUROC: 0.852–0.891) and ELSA-Brasil (AUROC: 0.859). Among individuals without baseline SHD, high vs. low ADAPT-HEART probability conferred a 2.8- to 5.7-fold increase in the risk of future SHD across data sources (all P < 0.05). Conclusion We propose a novel model that detects and predicts a range of SHDs from noisy single-lead ECGs obtainable on portable/wearable devices, providing a scalable strategy for community-based screening and risk stratification for SHD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it