MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409335792 · doi:10.1111/cgf.70010

FastAtlas: Real‐Time Compact Atlases for Texture Space Shading

2025· article· en· W4409335792 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicholas Vining, Zander Majercik, Feng Gu, Tadahiko Takikawa, Ty Trusty, Paul Lalonde, Morgan McGuire, Alla Sheffer

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Graphics Forum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of TorontoNorthern Digital (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)ShadingComputer visionTexture (cosmology)Artificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Texture‐space shading (TSS) methods decouple shading and rasterization, allowing shading to be performed at a different framerate and spatial resolution than rasterization. TSS has many potential applications, including streaming shading across networks, and reducing rendering cost via shading reuse across consecutive frames and/or shading at reduced resolutions relative to display resolution. Real‐time TSS shading requires texture atlases small enough to be easily stored in GPU memory. Using static atlases leads to significant space wastage, motivating real‐time per‐frame atlassing strategies that pack only the content visible in each frame. We propose FastAtlas, a novel atlasing method that runs entirely on the GPU and is fast enough to be performed at interactive rates per‐frame. Our method combines new per‐frame chart computation and parametrization strategies and an efficient general chart packing algorithm. Our chartification strategy removes visible seams in output renders, and our parameterization ensures a constant texel‐to‐pixel ratio, avoiding undesirable undersampling artifacts. Our packing method is more general, and produces more tightly packed atlases, than previous work. Jointly, these innovations enable us to produce shading outputs of significantly higher visual quality than those produced using alternative atlasing strategies. We validate FastAtlas by shading and rendering challenging scenes using different atlasing settings, reflecting the needs of different TSS applications (temporal reuse, streaming, reduced or elevated shading rates). We extensively compare FastAtlas to prior alternatives and demonstrate that it achieves better shading quality and reduces texture stretch compared to prior approaches using the same settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Graphics ForumSame topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207