MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409392184 · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112644

Behaviour of steel perforated plate seismic fuses in timber end brace connections

2025· article· en· W4409392184 on OpenAlexafffund
Hossein Daneshvar, Thomas Tannert, Ying Hei Chui, Carla Dickof

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Building Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis of Composite Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Northern British Columbia
KeywordsBraceStructural engineeringEngineeringGeologyForensic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perforated steel plates used as fuses in timber end brace connections (EBC) effectively dissipate seismic energy and minimize damage to the structure, with the added benefit of being replaceable post-seismic events. This study presents full-scale experimental tests on such connections. In the first phase, six configurations with circular and oval perforations were tested. The outcomes indicated that shear-yielding failure dominated at relatively small displacements, accompanied by minimal elastic bending and slight plastic hinge rotation deformations. However, there was a notable enhancement in ultimate deformation and energy dissipation for the oval perforations. Consequently, a second phase of the study was conducted to explore alternative perforation patterns and their corresponding failure mechanisms. Plates with long oval perforations exhibited the highest ultimate deformation of 14.4 mm, showing a 20 % increase compared to other patterns, along with an average over-strength factor of 1.4, and a ductility ratio of 15. These findings suggest that the preferred fuse-yielding mechanism is flexural, achieved using long oval perforations. The results confirmed that perforated steel plates function effectively as fuses, providing reliable yield mechanisms while protecting the integrity of the timber members. • This study investigates the seismic performance of timber end brace connections (EBCs) equipped with perforated steel plates acting as replaceable fuses, emphasizing energy dissipation and structural resilience under cyclic loading. • Phase 1 experiments examined circular and elliptical perforations, revealing that elliptical shapes achieved superior deformation and energy dissipation through a combination of shear and flexural yielding mechanisms. • In Phase 2, various perforation configurations, including long oval and diamond-shaped patterns, were tested to explore alternative yielding mechanisms, such as axial and flexural yielding. Long oval perforations exhibited the highest deformation capacity, achieving ultimate deformations of 14.4 mm and a ductility ratio of 15. • The study demonstrated that perforated plates with flexural yielding provide the most effective failure mechanism, localizing damage within the fuse and preserving timber elements. This ensures cost-effective and sustainable post-seismic recovery by enabling easy replacement of damaged components. • Results highlight the critical role of perforation geometry in enhancing stress concentration, ultimate deformation, and energy dissipation. Long oval perforations were identified as the most promising configuration, though further parametric studies are recommended to optimize performance. • Findings contribute to the development of ductile, energy-efficient seismic systems for timber-braced frames, advancing structural resiliency and sustainable design practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Building EngineeringSame topicStructural Analysis of Composite MaterialsFrench-language works237,207