MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409433157 · doi:10.3390/asi8020052

Real-Time Large-Scale Intrusion Detection and Prevention System (IDPS) CICIoT Dataset Traffic Assessment Based on Deep Learning

2025· article· en· W4409433157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied System Innovation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntrusion detection systemComputer scienceScale (ratio)Deep learningIntrusion prevention systemIntrusionArtificial intelligenceData miningCartographyGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research utilizes machine learning (ML), and especially deep learning (DL), techniques for efficient feature extraction of intrusion attacks. We use DL to provide better learning and utilize machine learning multilayer perceptron (MLP) as an intrusion detection (IDS) and intrusion prevention (IPS) system (IDPS) method. We deploy DL and MLP together as DLMLP. DLMLP improves the high detection of all intrusion attack features on the Internet of Things (IoT) device dataset, known as the CICIoT2023 dataset. We reference the CICIoT2023 dataset from the Canadian Institute of Cybersecurity (CIC) IoT device dataset. Our proposed method, the deep learning multilayer perceptron intrusion detection and prevention system model (DLMIDPSM), provides IDPST (intrusion detection and prevention system topology) capability. We use our proposed IDPST to capture, analyze, and prevent all intrusion attacks in the dataset. Moreover, our proposed DLMIDPSM employs a combination of artificial neural networks, ANNs, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Consequently, this project aims to develop a robust real-time intrusion detection and prevention system model. DLMIDPSM can predict, detect, and prevent intrusion attacks in the CICIoT2023 IoT dataset, with a high accuracy of above 85% and a high precision rate of 99%. Comparing the DLMIDPSM to the other literature, deep learning models and machine learning (ML) models have used decision tree (DT) and support vector machine (SVM), achieving a detection and prevention rate of 81% accuracy with only 72% precision. Furthermore, this research project breaks new ground by incorporating combined machine learning and deep learning models with IDPS capability, known as ML and DLMIDPSMs. We train, validate, or test the ML and DLMIDPSMs on the CICIoT2023 dataset, which helps to achieve higher accuracy and precision than the other deep learning models discussed above. Thus, our proposed combined ML and DLMIDPSMs achieved higher intrusion detection and prevention based on the confusion matrix’s high-rate attack detection and prevention values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it