MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409538862 · doi:10.1177/01622439251321233

Agriculture by Algorithm: Big Data, Digitalization, and Biotechnology Under Climate Change

2025· article· en· W4409538862 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Technology & Human Values · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureBig dataClimate changeAgricultural biotechnologyData sciencePolitical scienceBiotechnologyComputer scienceBiologyData miningEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on textual analysis of publicly available documents published by the Food and Agriculture Organization, Bayer, and its partner delivery start-ups, this paper provides insight into the data-driven processes and technologies that are transforming agriculture into digitally standardized precision farming. Digitalization and biotechnology are intertwined within an “agriculture by algorithm” directed toward eliminating site-specific variations on the farm and optimizing efficiency for increasing yield. This new agriculture, through measurable indicators, calculative metrics, and algorithmic modeling, relies on a commensuration process that converts agroecologically and experientially diverse ways of knowing into standard data units within Big Data. Supported by multistakeholder platforms, blended cofinancing, and venture capital, “agriculture by algorithm” is expanding the epistemic dominance of quantification into village farming, rendering local farming knowledges and assessments invisible and/or irrelevant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it