Research on the Innovation of Computer Basic Education Curriculum in Fine Arts Colleges and Universities Based on Network Education Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of time and technology has made the traditional basic computer teaching unable to meet the needs of current students, and the cultivation of computer thinking ability has become a hotspot of computer education concern. The article combines the flipped classroom model with the MOOC platform of network education, and establishes a MOOC flipped classroom teaching model applicable to computer basic education courses in art colleges. In this model, students’ assessment results data are collected, and the Apriori algorithm optimised by matrix optimisation and prior pruning strategy is used to mine the association relationship of the assessment results, which helps teachers to understand students’ computer knowledge mastery. T College of Fine Arts is used as a research example to illustrate the effectiveness of MOOC flipped classroom through the changes in students’ performance, competence, and satisfaction. The improved Apriori algorithm has an execution time of only 2.93s when its minimum support is 100%, which can be used to understand students’ computer application ability for different question types, majors and skill performances. The mean score of the final exam of the students in the experimental class was 82.79, which reached 111.79% of the score of the control class, and more than 80% of them were satisfied with the MOOC flipped classroom. The use of flipped classroom and network education model can achieve the innovative development of computer basic education courses in art colleges and help to enhance the teaching quality of computer basic education courses in art colleges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".