MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409588998 · doi:10.1111/mice.13488

A hybrid machine learning framework for wind pressure prediction on buildings with constrained sensor networks

2025· article· en· W4409588998 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceFidelityDimensionality reductionPressure sensorWind powerField (mathematics)High fidelityArtificial intelligenceMachine learningData miningEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate and efficient prediction of wind pressure distributions on high-rise building façades is crucial for mitigating structural risks in urban environments. Conventional approaches rely on extensive sensor networks, often hindered by cost, accessibility, and architectural limitations. This study proposes a novel hybrid machine learning (ML) framework that reconstructs high-fidelity wind pressure (HFWP) coefficient fields from a limited number of sensors by leveraging dynamic spatiotemporal feature extraction and mapping. The methodology consists of four key stages: (1) low-fidelity pressure field reconstruction from limited sensor data using constrained QR decomposition, (2) dimensionality reduction of both low-fidelity wind pressure and HFWP reconstructions to extract dominant spatiotemporal features, (3) dynamic mapping of the reduced-order representations using a long short-term memory network, and (4) prediction of the high-fidelity pressure field reconstruction over time. The proposed approach, which predicts the time history of high-fidelity pressure coefficients for various wind directions, is validated using wind tunnel data, with case studies on multiple façades—including the windward, right-side, and leeward surfaces—under various constrained sensor placement scenarios. The proposed methodology is also evaluated against alternative ML models, demonstrating superior accuracy in reconstructing the full pressure field. The results highlight the robustness and generalization capability of the model across different wind directions and sensor configurations, making it a practical solution for real-time wind pressure estimation in structural health monitoring and digital twin applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it