MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409603306 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-091

Research on the application of artificial intelligence in coal mine gas monitoring and prediction

2025· article· en· W4409603306 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeoscience and Mining Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoal miningCoalEnvironmental scienceMining engineeringArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePetroleum engineeringEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the application of artificial intelligence techniques in coal mine gas monitoring and prediction, aiming to construct more efficient and accurate gas concentration prediction models to reduce the risk of gas explosion in coal mine production.Due to the limited performance of traditional prediction methods in dealing with high-dimensional and dynamic three-dimensional mining environments, this study employs a fusion model based on temporal convolutional network (TCN) and temporal generative adversarial network (TimeGAN), TCN-TimeGAN, to predict the gas concentration.The model combines the interval sampling advantage of TCN and the time series characteristics of TimeGAN, and through four processes of embedding, recovering, by generating and discriminating gas concentration time sequences, the time-dependent features of gas concentration data can be effectively captured, thus improving the prediction accuracy and timeliness.In this study, gas concentration data from September 2020 through December 2021 were used as the basis, through data cleaning and outlier processing, it is found that the gas concentration data has obvious timedependence, which is suitable for using time series modeling.Embedding and Recovery Networks via TCN-TimeGAN Modeling, the gas concentration data are mapped to a low-dimensional feature space, a generative network is then used to generate new time series data from random noise, and the model parameters are optimized by combining the discriminative network in order to improve the quality and consistency of the generated data.In particular, to cope with the problem of gradient instability of generative adversarial networks during training, In this paper, Wasserstein distance is introduced to optimize the loss function and a gradient penalty term is added during the training process to improve the stability of model training and the realism in the samples generated.In addition, this study also explores the prediction performance of combining LSTM networks for gas concentration.The standard recurrent neural network (RNN) faces the problem of gradient vanishing in the processing of long time-dependent data, whereas the improved LSTM overcomes this problem through memory cells and gating mechanism for real-time prediction task of gas concentration.In this study, the LSTM is further extended to three-dimensional spatial input data, experiments demonstrate the prediction accuracy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it