MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409786988 · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2025.04.012

Low-Dose Tolvaptan for the Treatment of Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone–Associated Hyponatremia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis of Clinical Effectiveness and Safety

2025· review· en· W4409786988 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine Practice · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectrolyte and hormonal disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of King's College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolvaptanHyponatremiaMeta-analysisMeta-regressionIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Tolvaptan at the licensed dose of 15 mg effectively treats syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD)-associated hyponatremia. However, concerns about overcorrection and osmotic demyelination syndrome have limited its adoption. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lower tolvaptan doses (<15 mg) for treating SIAD-associated hyponatremia. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus from inception to February 2024. The primary outcomes were change in serum sodium and overcorrection rates. The secondary outcomes included adverse effects, hospital length of stay, and quality-of-life measures. We conducted meta-analyses using mean differences for efficacy and proportions for safety outcomes, with dose-based subgroup analyses and meta-regression. RESULTS: From 968 identified studies, 18 met inclusion criteria, comprising 495 patients. Initial doses below 15 mg increased the serum sodium level by 7.2 mmol/L (95% CI, 6.0-8.4) within 24 hours. In the 7.5-mg subgroup (n = 286), the mean increase was 7.8 mmol/L (95% CI, 6.2-9.4). The overcorrection rates were 31% (95% CI, 15%-53%) for an increase of ≥10 mmol/L and 10% (95% CI, 3%-20%) for an increase of ≥12 mmol/L in 24 hours. In the 3.75-mg subgroup, the mean increase was 7.1 mmol/L (95% CI, 4.7-9.6). There were insufficient data to review overcorrection rates. No cases of osmotic demyelination syndrome were reported. The secondary outcome data were insufficient for meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Low-dose tolvaptan (3.75-7.5 mg) effectively increases the serum sodium level in SIAD-associated hyponatremia. We recommend initiating tolvaptan at 7.5 mg, or 3.75 mg in high-risk patients, with close monitoring of sodium levels. These findings support a lower starting dose than currently licensed, although randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm optimal dosing strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0240.009
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it