MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409787324 · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108784

Automated strength-interval curve generation using actors

2025· article· en· W4409787324 on OpenAlexafffund
Raymond J. Spiteri, Joyce Reimer, Kyle Klenk

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInterval (graph theory)Computer scienceStatisticsMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Strength-interval (SI) curves are used by physiologists to quantify the response of excitable tissue as a function of the strength and timing of an electrical stimulus. In the context of cardiac electrophysiology, SI curves characterize the refractoriness of cardiac tissue as a function of inter-stimulus interval length. Although conventionally collected experimentally, this type of information can now more conveniently be obtained through computational simulation. Nevertheless, the computational generation of SI curves can be labor-intensive and time-consuming due to its iterative nature, the number and size of computations required, and the amount of manual researcher intervention involved. The objective of this study is to use the Actor Model of concurrent computation to automate the process of SI curve generation, relieving much of the burden from the researcher while maximizing the use of available computational resources. METHODS: The C++ Actor Framework is used to create an automated tool for controlling the openCARP simulation platform. An SI curve is generated for the bidomain model of electrophysiology through the use of sophisticated parallelization techniques, e.g., dynamic information passing between parallel simulations, facilitated by the use of actors. Computational resource management is optimized by the dynamic monitoring, assessment, and reallocation based on each actor's current simulation state in relation to all other actors. RESULTS: A bidomain SI curve with 31 data points that takes 27.5 h to compute conventionally using 80 CPU cores is now generated in 15.4 h. This is over 40% faster than using conventional parallel programming techniques with MPI. Furthermore, it requires no researcher intervention, which can add significantly to the time to solution. CONCLUSION: Novel parallelization techniques enabled via the Actor Model significantly improve the efficiency of computational SI curve generation, both from the viewpoints of computation and labor intensiveness. This improvement in efficiency has implications for future studies involving cardiac refractory tissue, along with other types of excitable tissue, including the rapid generation of both general and patient-specific SI curves and the use of these curves for design and in silico testing of new therapeutic tools such as personalized pacemakers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Methods and Programs in BiomedicineSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207