MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409814381 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.03.090

WiFi-based Indoor Positioning using Low-cost Microcontrollers and Signal Fingerprinting

2025· article· en· W4409814381 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMicrocontrollerSIGNAL (programming language)Embedded systemReal-time computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of positioning or localization is important in many applications, including cellular devices, sensor networks, Internet-of-Things, vehicles and human beings. For some applications, Global Positioning System (GPS)-based algorithms provide adequate accuracy. In many cases, cellular networks are used to augment GPS and other signals to improve the accuracy. However, in indoor environments, GPS does not work or does not provide satisfactory accuracy. In this paper, we propose a low-cost, high-accuracy solution to the problem of indoor localization. In particular, we focus on buildings with existing Wifi infrastructure. We use low-cost, low-power, WiFi-enabled microcontroller units to build a system that models wireless signal fingerprint data using simple machine learning methods. We demonstrate through experiments carried out in a university building that our system provides high accuracy. We also study the change in accuracy with the increase in number of microcontroller units used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it