Single-cell Transcriptional Atlas of Human Hematopoiesis Reveals Genetic and Hierarchy-Based Determinants of Aberrant AML Differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Therapeutic targeting of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is hampered by intra- and inter-tumoral cell state heterogeneity. To develop a more precise understanding of AML cell states, we constructed a reference atlas of human hematopoiesis from 263,159 single-cell transcriptomes spanning 55 cellular states. Using this atlas, we mapped more than 1.2 million cells spanning 318 leukemia samples, revealing 12 recurrent patterns of aberrant differentiation in AML. Notably, this uncovered unexpected AML cell states resembling lymphoid and erythroid progenitors that were prognostic within the clinically heterogeneous context of normal karyotype AML, independent of genomic classifications. Systematic mapping of genotype-to-phenotype associations revealed specific differentiation landscapes associated with more than 45 genetic drivers. Importantly, distinct cellular hierarchies can arise from samples sharing the same genetic driver, potentially reflecting distinct cellular origins for disease-sustaining leukemia stem cells. Thus, precise mapping of malignant cell states provides insights into leukemogenesis and refines disease classification in acute leukemia. SIGNIFICANCE: We present a single-cell reference atlas of human hematopoiesis and a computational tool for rapid mapping and classification of healthy and leukemic cells. Applied to AML, this has enabled single-cell analysis at the scale of hundreds of patient samples, revealing the full breadth of derailment of differentiation in AML. See related commentary by Berger and Penter, p. 280.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".