A Dual-Loop Modified Active Disturbance Rejection Control Scheme for a High-Purity Distillation Column
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-purity distillation columns typically give rise to multi-variable, strongly coupled nonlinear systems with substantial time delay and significant inertia. The control performance of high-purity distillation columns crucially influences the purity of the final product. Taking into account the process of a high-purity distillation column, this article puts forward a dual-loop modified active disturbance rejection control (MADRC) scheme to improve the control of product purity. During the stable operation of the distillation process, the structures of two control loops are, respectively, approximated by two linear transfer function models via open-loop experiments. Subsequently, the compensation part of the MADRC scheme is designed, respectively, for each approximate model. Furthermore, this paper employs singular perturbation theory to prove the stability of MADRC. The performance of the dual-loop MADRC scheme (MADRC) is compared with that of a proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control scheme, a cascade PID control scheme (CPID), and a regular ADRC scheme (ADRC). The simulations demonstrate that the dual-loop MADRC scheme is capable of efficiently tracking the reference value and exhibits optimal disturbance rejection capabilities. Additionally, the superiority of the dual-loop MADRC scheme is validated through Monte Carlo trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".