MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409985601 · doi:10.32396/usurj.v10i1.812

"The Grass is Always Greener" and "Questions for AI"

2025· article· en· W4409985601 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kate Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueUSURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComputational and Text Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgroforestryEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a third-year undergraduate student studying Interactive Systems Design, Kate’s art explores a variety of mediums, in which a focus on the creative aspect of perspective is carried throughout her work. With Kate’s complementary interests in art and technology, she primarily experiments with graphic design, digital illustration, photography, and a combination of these mediums in her projects. "The Grass Is Always Greener": This piece is a digital print created using Adobe Photoshop that parodies the well-known “grass is greener” proverb. "Questions for AI": There are some questions out there that are hard to think about or ask. Perhaps even some that we will never have definitive answers for. However, as technology continues on its course of rapid advancement within the landscape of our ever-evolving society, these are the questions that stand between us and our understanding of where the future of humanity lies. As such, “Questions for AI” is a digital print series that prompts viewers to reflect not only upon recent modern development in artificial intelligence, but also on the new realities of the human race.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.027
Scholarly communication0.0120.014
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research JournalSame topicComputational and Text Analysis MethodsFrench-language works237,207