MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410115253 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3567357

Segmentation of Individual Trees in TLS Point Clouds via Graph Optimization

2025· article· en· W4410115253 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer sciencePoint cloudSegmentationGraphImage segmentationArtificial intelligenceComputer visionTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individual tree segmentation from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) point clouds is essential for precise forest inventory, instance-level tree modeling, and the estimation of forest stock volume. However, current instance-level segmentation techniques encounter significant challenges in complex forest environments, particularly those characterized by dense understory vegetation and substantial crown overlap in natural forests. These complexities reduce segmentation accuracy and limit the generalizability of existing methods across diverse forest types. This paper presents a unified method for individual tree segmentation that integrates trunk localization with crown segmentation. The trunk localization uses normal vector features to eliminate non-trunk slice points, employs an enhanced DBSCAN algorithm for trunk slice separation, and refines trunk positions by fitting circular-like trunk slices using the Hough transform. This integrated approach ensures precise segmentation and optimization of final trunk positions. Subsequently, a graph-based optimization method is applied for crown segmentation. This method incorporates supervoxel technology, an optimal Euclidean distance metric between supervoxels, and a supervoxel similarity metric to construct an optimal undirected graph. Tree crown supervoxels are segmented by tracing the shortest path from the crown supervoxels to their corresponding tree roots. We validated the proposed method on eight sample plots representing various complexities and forest types. For tree trunk localization, the proposed method achieved an average Mean accuracy of 0.761, which is 27% higher than the best result among the three traditional methods. For crown segmentation, it achieved an average mIoU of 0.645, marking a 31% improvement over the best baseline performance. The source code for our individual tree segmentation method is available at https://github.com/TLS-tree/tree-segmentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it