MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410116557 · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-24-0298.1

A Simple Model for Global Temperature Control on Dansgaard–Oeschger Oscillations

2025· article· en· W4410116557 on OpenAlexafffund
Louis-Philippe Nadeau, Malte F. Jansen, Sandy Grégorio

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Climate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSimons FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsClimatologySimple (philosophy)General Circulation ModelGeologyMadden–Julian oscillationMeteorologyClimate changeConvectionOceanographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract During the last glacial period, the Northern Hemisphere climate underwent dramatic swings between relatively warm periods and cold periods—the Dansgaard–Oeschger oscillations. Here, we use recent progress in our theoretical understanding of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation to develop a simple predictive model that relates variations in the overturning circulation to rapid changes in North Atlantic sea ice and the gradual recharge and discharge of the deep ocean temperature. The robustness of the model is tested against results from idealized general circulation model simulations, and exploration of its parameter space provides insights into the mechanisms dictating the overturning circulation’s response to atmospheric forcing variations. The theoretical model predicts that global atmospheric temperature and salinity fluxes control the relative length of stadial versus interstadial conditions and reproduces the evolving characteristics of the δ 18 O isotope ice core record over the last 100 kyr when forced only by the slowly changing global mean temperature. The findings indicate that the prominent climate variability observed in the Greenland ice cores is directly influenced by the gradual evolution of global temperatures and salinity fluxes. This variability can be attributed to a relatively simple physical mechanism that involves the interplay of fast positive sea ice and salt-advection feedbacks, along with a delayed negative deep-ocean-temperature feedback.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ClimateSame topicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationFrench-language works237,207