Algorithm 1057: FunC: A Minimally Invasive C++ Library for the Generation and Analysis of Univariate Lookup Tables
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Lookup Table (LUT) is a computationally inexpensive piecewise function used to approximate computationally expensive mathematical functions. Evaluating a LUT can be as quick as using Horner’s method to evaluate a polynomial after looking up its coefficients. A common choice of LUT is a piecewise constant or piecewise linear function; however, high-degree interpolating polynomials can also be valuable. Here, we describe the functionality of FunC 2.0, a C++ library designed to streamline the process of building, comparing, and implementing univariate LUTs in practical applications. In particular, FunC 2.0 can build relatively small LUTs satisfying user-provided absolute and relative tolerances for error. Furthermore, FunC 2.0 can build nonuniform LUTs, it provides utilities to quickly determine reasonable LUT bounds and tolerances for error, and it provides a way to quickly profile a set of LUTs. We demonstrate FunC ’s utility in application by reducing the total runtime of a simulation performed by the Canadian Hydrological Model (CHM). This simulation modeled the snow mass distribution across Western Canada over 1 month. Now, the CHM can evaluate the mathematical function of interest about 28 times faster, allowing the necessary algorithm to finish two times faster, and the overall simulation is about 9% faster.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it