Research on the Influence of Fan Culture on Teenagers' Psychology and Behavior
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chinese fan culture is a diverse and complex phenomenon, constantly evolving along with social, economic, and Internet development. Fan culture is also a multi-layered and multi-dimensional cultural phenomenon, covering personal emotion, social interaction, commercial value, and cultural creativity. Fan culture not only brings optimistic emotional value but also boosts economic development. However, research on the effects of fan culture on adolescent psychology and behavior remains inadequate. This paper analyzes adolescents' participation in fan culture in the age of social media, focusing on the problematic representations of adolescents' psychology and behavior. The article analyzes that fan culture not only brings positive emotions to teenagers but also brings the problem of excessive consumption, which affects the thinking mode and physical and mental health of teenagers. Based on this, this paper puts forward suggestions to guide teenagers to actively participate in fan culture from the aspects of social media, star organizers, teenagers and parents, and social atmosphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it