MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410142759 · doi:10.1088/1361-6420/add55b

On the estimation of the time-dependent transmission rate in epidemiological models

2025· article· en· W4410142759 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jorge P. Zubelli, Jennifer Loria, Vinicius Albani

Bibliographic record

VenueInverse Problems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimationMathematicsTransmission (telecommunications)EpidemiologyStatisticsEconometricsTransmission rateApplied mathematicsMedicineComputer sciencePathologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to improve the modeling, estimation, and prediction of how infectious diseases spread. Susceptible-exposed-infected-removed (SEIR)-like models have been particularly successful in providing accurate short-term predictions. this study fills a notable literature gap by exploring the following question: is it possible to incorporate a nonparametric SEIR COVID-19 model into the inverse-problem regularization framework when the transmission coefficient varies over time? our positive response considers varying degrees of disease severity, vaccination, and other time-dependent parameters. in addition, we demonstrate the continuity, differentiability, and injectivity of the operator that link the transmission parameter to the observed infection numbers. by employing Tikhonov-type regularization to the corresponding inverse problem, we establish the existence and stability of regularized solutions. numerical examples using both synthetic and real infection data from Chicago and Canada illustrate the accuracy of the model estimation and its ability to fit the data effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInverse ProblemsSame topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207