MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410233295 · doi:10.3390/appliedmath5020054

Time Dynamics of Systemic Risk in Banking Networks: A UEDR-PDE Approach

2025· article· en· W4410233295 on OpenAlexaff
I. Irakoze, Dennis Ikpe, Fulgence Nahayo, Samuel Asante Gyamerah

Bibliographic record

VenueAppliedMath · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystemic riskDynamics (music)BusinessComputer scienceFinancial systemRisk analysis (engineering)EconomicsFinancial crisisPsychologyMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the time dynamics of systemic risk in banking networks is crucial for preventing financial crises and ensuring economic stability. This paper aims to quantify key transition times in the evolution of distress within a banking system using a mathematical framework. We investigate the dynamics of systemic risk in a hypothetical, homogeneous banking network using the Undistressed–Exposed–Distressed–Recovered (UEDR) model. The UEDR model, inspired by compartmental epidemic frameworks, captures how financial distress propagates and recedes through interactions between banks. It is selected because of its tractability and its ability to distinguish between different stages of bank vulnerability. We focus on two critical times, denoted as t1 and t2, which play a fundamental role in understanding the behavior of the distressed compartment (representing the number of distressed banks) over time. The time t1 represents the first instance of a decrease in the number of distressed banks, indicating the containment of systemic risk. On the other hand, the time t2 marks the onset when the number of undistressed banks falls below a specified threshold, signifying the restoration of financial stability. We examine these time dependencies by considering the initial conditions of the UEDR model and assess their characteristics using partial differential equations. We establish the continuity, smoothness, and uniqueness of solutions for t1 and t2, along with their corresponding boundary conditions. Furthermore, we provide explicit representation formulas for t1 and t2, allowing for precise estimation when the initial population compartments are large. Our results provide practical insights for financial regulators and policymakers in determining time-sensitive interventions for mitigating systemic risk and accelerating recovery in banking systems. The findings highlight how mathematical modeling can inform real-time risk management strategies in financial networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAppliedMathSame topicBanking stability, regulation, efficiencyFrench-language works237,207