Small-cell-based fast active learning of machine learning interatomic potentials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are often trained with on-the-fly active learning, where sampled configurations from atomistic simulations are added to the training set. However, this approach is limited by the high computational cost of ab initio calculations for large systems. Recent works have shown that MLIPs trained on small cells (1–8 atoms) rival the accuracy of large-cell models (100s of atoms) at far lower computational cost. Herein, we refer to these as small-cell and large-cell training, respectively. In this work, we iterate on earlier small-cell training approaches and characterize our resultant small-cell protocol. Potassium and sodium-potassium systems were studied: the former, a simpler system benchmarked in detail; the latter, a more complex binary system for further validation. Our small-cell training approach achieves up to two orders of magnitude of cost savings compared to large-cell (54-atom) training, with some training runs requiring fewer than 120 core-hours. Static and thermodynamic properties predicted using the MLIPs were evaluated, with small-cell training in both systems yielding strong ab initio agreement. Small cells appear to encode the necessary information to model complex large-scale phenomena—solid-liquid interfaces, critical exponents, diverse concentrations—even when the training cells themselves are too small to accommodate these phenomena. Based on these tests, we provide analysis and recommendations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".