MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410279090 · doi:10.5539/jas.v17n6p42

Understanding Gender Dynamics on the Intentions of Small-Scale Traders to Trade in Edible Insects in Kenya

2025· article· en· W4410279090 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)Dynamics (music)Economic geographyEconomicsPsychologyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grounded in their status as a delicacy in East Africa, the trade of edible insects is increasingly acknowledged as a viable solution to food security and sustainable livelihoods. However, gender differences in trading intentions remain underexplored, particularly in informal and emerging markets. Existing research emphasizes economic and structural barriers but often overlooks the psychological and social determinants. This study addresses this gap by examining gender-specific factors influencing the intention to engage in edible insect trade, integrating demographic, socio-economic, and psychological perspectives. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), multiple regression, and an ordered probit model, we analyzed survey data from 550 traders across key food markets in Kenya, the analysis distinguished how gender moderates the effects of participation intentions. Results revealed that psychological determinants exerted a more significant influence than socio-economic variables on trading intentions. For females, perceived behavioral control (β = 0.775, p < 0.001) and descriptive norms (β = 0.536, p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors, underscoring the importance of self-efficacy and social influence. Conversely, for male traders, attitude (β = 0.331, p < 0.001) and descriptive norms (β = 0.580, p < 0.001) emerged as dominant factors, suggesting a more individualistic decision-making process. These findings highlight the necessity to enhance women’s self-efficacy through training, financing, and market access while leveraging attitudinal and social reinforcement strategies to encourage male participation. The study contributes to the behavioral economics literature on emerging markets and offers practical insights for policymakers, development agencies, and entrepreneurs seeking to promote sustainable insect-based trade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it