New Approaches for Network Topology Optimization Using Deep Reinforcement Learning and Graph Neural Network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The exponential growth in Internet-connected devices has escalated the demand for optimized network topologies to ensure high performance. Traditional optimization methods often fall short in scalability and adaptability when it comes to network topology planning. In this paper, we address the challenge of transforming mesh topologies into tree topologies for wireless networks, with the objective of maximizing throughput. We propose two new methods: Path Selection with Rejection Strategy (PSRS), which leverages Message-Passing Neural Networks (MPNN), and Dual-Agent Tree Topology Exploration (DATTE), which employs Graph Attention Networks (GAT). These schemes integrate Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to construct efficient tree topologies with the goal of maximizing the minimum throughput of the wireless network. Experimental results validate the scalability and performance gains of the proposed approaches, highlighting their potential for real-world applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it