MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410313906 · doi:10.32920/ifmj.v4i1-2.2050

Sounding a Clearing

2024· article· en· W4410313906 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInteractive Film and Media Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSound Studies and Aurality
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClearingDepth soundingRemote sensingGeologyEnvironmental scienceBusinessOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recognizing processes of sonic marginalization, contemporary sound scholars increasingly orient their work towards an awareness of historical contexts and theoretical frameworks that emphasize diversity, intercultural understandings, and the multiple intersecting relationships of power in sound studies, media studies, and related areas. As evidenced in recent calls to remap and decolonize the field through alternative listening approaches – such as “fugitive listening” (Brooks 2020), “border listening” (Cárdenas 2020), “critical listening positionality” (Robinson 2020), and “abolitionary listening” (Arthur et. al. 2021) – it is imperative to consider the ways in which listening heals as well as harms, attunes as well as captures, thereby requiring substantial critical and creative inquiry. Using a case study approach, auto-ethnography, and interviews, this paper turns to a multi-media exhibition at Gallery TPW in Toronto to examine divergent, collective, and alternative listening practices that open up other worlds already out there by attuning to forgotten histories and aural experimentations, forging what I can “otherwise social relations” through intimate encounters with sound and its wider historical and political entanglements. Curated by Toleen Touq, the exhibition Another World That Sounds Like You (2023) features sound-based works by artists Bani Abidi, Nick Dourado, JJJJJerome Ellis, Urok Shirhan, and Hong-Kai Wang. This multi-faceted show centres the relationship of sound to various global social, political, and cultural movements, and invites audiences to participate in an act of slow, careful, communal engagement within a space designed to resemble a living room with several rugs and low comfortable seating, nurturing warm and participatory forms of connection. The listening practices and affective experiences that the exhibition stages are established through a confluence of mechanisms – the material affordances and implications embedded within the installation design, which are tied to the show's conceptualization, and the selection of an international range of artworks that endeavors to cross boundaries and borders. When taken together, as in the case in Another World That Sounds Like You, these components enlist the visitor in a web of relations that is equal parts complex, meditative, and shared. I ultimately argue that the sonic, when distributed across otherwise relational modes, enunciates alternative enactments of sociality and collectivity through methods of intimacy, opacity, and fugitivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it