Fiction and the entrepreneurial imagination
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article introduces a special issue on ‘Fiction and the Entrepreneurial Imagination’ with three main objectives. First, it provides a brief overview of existing scholarship related to the use of literature in management and entrepreneurship studies for readers unfamiliar with this perspective and its methodologies. Second, it reviews the ten articles included in the special issue, summarizing how they tackle key challenges in entrepreneurship research. Various literary forms – drama, poetry, novels, and music – offer insights into the complex nature of entrepreneurship by exploring the essence of possibility, the intricacies of path dependence, the formation of founder identity, and the influence of personal values, place attachment, and gender. These articles advocate for diverse perspectives on emancipatory entrepreneurship and encourage a more nuanced vocabulary to describe entrepreneurial actions and emotions. Together, these contributions highlight the role of imagination in shaping entrepreneurial paths. Finally, we suggest how literature can enhance entrepreneurship scholarship in ways that other perspectives and methodologies might not achieve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it