Learning From Limited Temporal Data: Dynamically Sparse Historical Functional Linear Models With Applications to Earth Science
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Scientists and statisticians often seek to understand the complex relationships that connect two time‐varying variables. Recent work on sparse functional historical linear models confirms that they are promising as a tool for obtaining complex and interpretable inferences, but several notable limitations exist. Most importantly, previous works have imposed sparsity on the historical coefficient function, but have not allowed the sparsity, hence lag, to vary with time. We simplify the framework of sparse functional historical linear models by using a rectangular coefficient structure along with Whittaker smoothing, then reduce the assumptions of the previous frameworks by estimating the dynamic time lag from a hierarchical coefficient structure. We motivate our study by aiming to extract the physical rainfall–runoff processes hidden within hydrological data. We show the promise and accuracy of our method using eight simulation studies, further justified by two real sets of hydrological data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it